Delhi High Court Declines Determination of Res-judicata in Section 11 Application, Appoints Arbitrator (Via the Indian Arbitration Blog)

The Petitioner in Parsvnath Developers v. Rail Land Development Authority[1] requested the Delhi High Court to appoint a nominee arbitrator for the recalcitrant Respondent under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (the Arbitration Act), in a dispute arising out of a development agreement (the Agreement). Continue reading

Deconstructing the Delhi High Court’s Anti-Arbitration Injunction against Vodafone UK’s BIT Arbitration

This article was first posted here on the IndiaCorpLaw Blog ( 

The Delhi High Court (the Court) in its order dated 22nd August 2017 has passed an ex-parte interim injunction restraining Vodafone UK entities (Defendants) from initiating investment arbitration against the Union of India (UOI) under the India-UK Bilateral Investment Treaty (BIT) [the Order]. Amidst the post-amendment fervor of the Indian arbitration regime, the Order is arguably reminiscent of India’s erstwhile interventionist approach to arbitration. Continue reading

Internship @ Samvad Partners || Great work, No stipend, IPR and Civil matters

By Chaitanya Reddy
ILS Law College

Worked at :

Samvad Partners, Chennai.

Address: 11/6, 2nd floor, Railway colony 3rd Street

Nelson Manickam road, Aminjikarai, Chennai 600 029, India.

Continue reading

Internship Experience: Bharucha and Partners ||Mumbai||Great Work|| No Stipend

Harish Adwant, IV B.S.L. LL.B., ILS Law College, Pune.

Worked at:

Bharucha and Partners, Mumbai.

Continue reading

Retrospectively Yours, Law Minister: Section 29A of the amended Arbitration Act Shall Apply Prospectively

Ritvik M. Kulkarni

Image source:

Immediately after the Arbitration Ordinance was promulgated on October 23, 2015, the legal fraternity stood divided on whether provisions of the Act, Section 29A in particular, would apply retroactively, retrospectively or prospectively. Section 29A requires inter alia that the arbitration be concluded within a period of 12 months; extendable by a maximum 6 months by mutual consent of the parties. The question of its applicability to pending / on-going arbitrations was first raised before the Madras High Court in Delphi TVS Diesel Systems Ltd. v. Union of India[1], wherein the Court directed the Central Government to clarify this anomaly forthwith. The Court correctly noted that,

There would be huge litigations unnecessarily generated in respect of the pending arbitrations and the provision being procedural in nature fixing the time limit, it can be clarified that it would be either not applicable to the pending arbitrations or if it is applicable to the pending arbitrations, the time period specified therein would commence from the date of the Ordinance, to obviate such unnecessary litigations”.

The Lok Sabha on December 17, 2015 passed the Arbitration (Amendment) Bill, 2015 in all its revolutionary glory. One of the most important developments in this Act is that the Law Minister has finally clarified and settled the waters over the temporal applicability of the Act. After due deliberation in Parliament, the Union Law Minister Dr. Sadananda Gowda added the following clause to the amending act:

Continue reading

Internship Experience: Wadia Ghandy & Co. (Dispute Resolution Practice), Mumbai| Good Work| Rs. 1500/- Westside Voucher

 Name and Contact Details:

Ritvik M. Kulkarni, ILS Law College Pune

Continue reading