Tracking the IP Journey into School and College Syllabus (Part-II)

By Harish S. Adwant, III BSL LLB, ILS Law College, Pune

The Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion (DIPP) is working relentlessly in order to introduce “IP teaching” in educational institutions, as recommended by the Draft National IPR Policy.

DIPP is corresponding with National Council for Educational Research and Training (NCERT) and Central Board for Secondary Education (CBSE) to introduce IPR in the syllabus of Class IX students. The correspondences indicate that IPR may be introduced as a topic in social sciences or economics to familiarize students to patents and trademarks.

Simultaneously, DIPP is also planning on deliberating with the Ministry of Human Resource Development (HRD) and All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE) on introducing IPR as a separate subject in engineering colleges.

According to DIPP, this initiative is a part of the wider policy, framed by the body, to make the patent application process time-effective and technologically driven, create public awareness about IPR, and encourage more Indian patent filings. “There was a need for India to push for innovation through the IPR policy, which is in the works”, said Commerce and Industry Minister Nirmala Sitharaman.

The government is expected to announce the National IPR policy in the next three months, which will regulate the current IPR law framework and declare the future road-map. A draft has already been circulated for inter-ministerial comments, after which it will be sent to the cabinet for approval.

The proposals, recommended by the Draft IPR policy, will have to be executed only after scrutinizing and anticipating the hurdles faced by the present education system in India. DIPP must make the necessary arrangements in order to ensure quality education and avoid it from being an additional liability over the students.

 

Advertisements

Tracking the IP Journey into School and College Syllabus (Part-I)

By Harish S. Adwant, III BSL LLB, ILS Law College, Pune 

In 2008, LiveMint had reported that the Kerala State Government is going to implement an IP Education Policy to include the teaching of IPR in schools and other academic institutions. An official from the State Education Ministry said in the report, “The state will initially start five or six centres of excellence to provide degree-level classes to students in all five universities, and faculty will be provided in the universities and its affiliated institutions over a period of time”.

Furthermore, the then Kerala law minister M. Vijayakumar said in June 2008 that the IPR policy was the first step towards making the state “IP savvy.” The state had planned to form a body under the law department called “Mission IPR” to oversee patent rights administration. (LiveMint)
However, it may be noted that the Kerala IP policy has not been completely implemented so far.

In 2015, Hindustan Unilever (HUL), Mumbai based consumer goods company has insisted the government to include IPR as a subject in the school syllabus of secondary and higher-secondary students.

Dev Bajpai, Executive Director, Legal and Corporate Affairs, HUL said “We have proposed to the government that intellectual property should be part of the syllabus in schools because we feel we have to catch them young”. HUL made this proposal as a part of its suggestions made to the new National IP Policy of the NDA government, aimed at standardizing the implementation of IPR laws and regulations in India.

HUL, the country’s largest consumer products company voiced its concerns with respect to trademark infringement, loss of sales and brand dilution and decided to include the prospective consumers in the battle against circulation of counterfeit products in the market. It has also decided to engage directly with students and educating them about the importance of brands and how to identify genuine and fake products.

Counterfeit products are fake products, having similar appearance and packaging, which are produced and sold at a giveaway price to take an advantage of the superior value of the imitated product. Counterfeiting remains to be an impending peril to the established brands as it accounts to 3-5% of all the products sold in the 2.4 Lakh crores FMCG market in India. This figure multiplies to an annual loss of 8000-12,000 crores to the branded products in the market.

The initiative, fostered by HUL, allows the students to understand the elements of a commercial market and creates consumer awareness regarding counterfeit goods at a very nascent stage. However, this project should be limited to its objective and should not be formulated into a subject to be evaluated in the academic examinations at the school level.